Why create a reading list of the best philosophy books for beginners? Well, Bertrand Russell once said that ‘science is what you know, philosophy is what you don’t know’, and when it comes to philosophy – I don’t know nearly enough. The vastness and occasional intangibility of the subject can make it feel inaccessible for novices. Like trying to find the end of a piece of sellotape, it can be frustrating to know where to start. In situations like this, there is only one thing you can do – ask the experts what they’d recommend as the best philosophy books for beginners. Luckily for me, I’ve had the pleasure of interviewing some of the world’s finest philosophical minds.
* 2021 Update *
In the bounce of 2021, ascribable to the achiever of this interpretation number, I reached out to the original contributors and asked if they would want to add another koran or two to the list if they had the gamble. Most agreed that they ’ five hundred love the opportunity. What ’ mho even more excite, is that I have reached out to some brand new doctrine experts and asked them to contribute their own nominations. The consequence is an extend list of the best philosophy books for beginners. I hope you enjoy this republished, second edition if you will – thank you !
Discover the Best Philosophy Books for Beginners…
Massimo Pigliucci:
Alfred Whitehead famously said that all western philosophy is but a footnote to Plato. That ’ second more than a slight exaggeration, and however I seriously doubt anyone can appreciate philosophy without reading Socrates ’ most celebrated scholar. These five dialogues are excellent examples of Plato ’ s prose and philosophical acumen.
The Euthyphro presents an argument, even valid today, that morality can not possibly derive from gods, careless of whether the latter exist or not. The Apology features Socrates ’ own defense at the trial where he was accused of impiety and corruption of the Athenian youth, and at which he was condemned to death. The Crito is a dialogue in which Socrates explores the concept of justice and proposes an early translation of social condense hypothesis. The Meno is a glorious example of the Socratic method acting, focused on an exploration of the theme of merit, though we besides get the celebrated definition of cognition as justify dependable impression. ultimately, the Phaedo presents us with the last moments of Socrates ’ biography, where the philosopher talks about the soul and the afterlife. The collection is plainly an astounding case of good write and good doctrine .
Paradoxes by Mark Sainsbury
Mary Margaret McCabe:
Thinking about truth and cognition and value, as philosophy does, is very surprising, all the time. Any route into philosophy needs to capture that storm, at the same time as slowing us down, getting us to think and rethink every step – because this kind of think should be slow, american samoa well as surprising. Beginning in doctrine fair is doing it, for the first clock. So my first suggestion is unmanageable and needs to be taken lento, but it starts out with the surprise :
Mark Sainsbury ’ s fantastic Paradoxes. It is beautifully written, and the paradoxes actually bite, and when you work your way through the ledger you discover the very complexities that are provoked by these particular surprises. It starts with Zeno of Elea and his paradoxes of motion and works its manner through puzzles about heaps ( and vagueness ) rationality ( and decision-making ) to the Liar paradox and the debates about truth the Liar provoked. It is a book you can start and come back to, over and over again .
many of the experiential philosophers were cool and stimulate and iconoclastic. Sarah Bakewell shows this well, along with the allure, dangers, and legacies of their philosophies. The book is a weaving together of the lives and ideas of Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Albert Camus, Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Hannah Arendt, Frantz Fanon, Iris Murdoch, and about 68 other characters – ultimately providing a sprightly introduction to a broad range of intellectual giants of the twentieth Century .
Mortal Questions by Thomas Nagel
Quassim Cassam:
I ’ ve constantly thought that the best direction into philosophy is to read some accessible first-rate doctrine. truly accessible, authentically first-rate doctrine is hard to find, but Thomas Nagel ’ s Mortal Questions is constantly the beginning case that come to my mind. The first gear thing to grab one ’ mho attention is the number of topics covered : death, the think of of life, sexual perversion, war and massacre and brain bisection, among others. Which person with evening an snow leopard of philosophic curiosity could fail to be interest in such matters ? Nagel ’ s writing combines simplicity and elegance with depth. arsenic good as being a model of philosophical writing, this is besides a solicitation of massively influential papers. For what it ’ randomness worth, most of the papers in this volume are highly cited, but from a novice ’ s perspective that matters much less than their combination of magnificence and handiness. Nagel has a way capturing the reader ’ randomness attention and not letting go until very the last sentence. For example, the try on ‘ The Absurd ’ begins with the notice that ‘ Most people feel on occasion that life is absurd, and some feel it vividly and continually ’. Who can resist reading on ? I ’ ve constantly liked Nagel ’ sulfur conclusion : if nothing actually matters, then it doesn ’ t count that nothing matters and ‘ we can approach our absurd lives with sarcasm alternatively of heroism or despair ’ .
David Papineau:
In my position, doctrine is best when it responds to intellectual challenges arising in other areas of think, like physics, or psychology, or politics. That ’ s how I was brought into doctrine – I was puzzled about expression of mathematics and physics long before I did any philosophy courses. then I have chosen three books that weren ’ thymine written as introductions to doctrine, but even then will inescapably make their readers start thinking deeply about philosophical issues .
Penrose is a atavist to the age of authors who respected their readers adequate to explain things by rights. When he mentions complex numbers, say, or quantum mechanics, or Turing machines, he doesn ’ triiodothyronine just wave his pen at their mysteries but stops to go through the details, using equations where necessity, along with pictures, metaphors and the gain linguistic process of understanding. As a solution, he lays bare why both mind and matter are so confusing. Some of his eventual incontrovertible suggestions, which have quantum gravity enabling human minds to transcend Gödel ’ sulfur theorem, are pretty cockamamie, to be honest. But his real accomplishment is to convey how deeply cryptic nature is .
Eddy Keming Chen:
If you want to understand what Confucianism is about, start with this koran. Mengzi lived in the Warrings States time period ( 403-221 B.C.E ) in China and was one of the most significant followers of Confucius and an influential teacher of the confucian room. The book Mengzi collects dialogues Mengzi had with assorted rulers and thinkers of that fourth dimension. You can learn about Mengzi ’ second views about virtues, ethical cultivation, political philosophy, even cosmology and the enigmatic notion of “ qi. ” Unlike the other confucian classics such as the Analects, the Great Learning, and the Doctrine of the Mean, this koran is filled with engaging stories and is much easier to understand. ( I highly recommend reading the early classics after you finish reading the Mengzi. ) Mengzi ’ sulfur arguments are besides profoundly relevant to contemporaneous discussions about human nature, education, and moral psychology .
Adrian Moore:
A list of the best doctrine books for beginners might be expected to include contemporary texts that are designed precisely as introductions to the subject. And indeed there are plenty of excellent text of that kind. But I have included two classics on my list. This is because I believe that, when a great philosophical text is angstrom accessible as each of these is, then there is very no better way of gaining an theme of what doctrine is than to plunge straight into it. This is not the paradox that it appears to be. In philosophy there is no shallow end or deep end – and no starting distributor point or end point .
The first of the classics on my list is Plato ’ s negotiation, Meno. Plato pretty much invented the subject, over two thousand years ago. Yet this dialogue is as fresh and a clear as it ever was. The guiding consequence in it is whether virtue can be taught. But it ranges much more wide than that. It touches on some of the most basic questions about human beings and their home in the earth. It is lively, engaging, and inordinately deep – a brilliant initiation to the subject .
Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault by Pierre Hadot
Massimo Pigliucci:
The term “ doctrine ” nowadays refers to a highly specialize academic field of question, analogous to science, literary criticism, history, and so forth. But ever since Socrates philosophy has besides been practical, the art of life well and meaningfully. Pierre Hadot is arguably the most influential generator that has contributed to bringing back practical philosophy to a broad public, to remind us that the unexamined life may not be worth living .
The book begins by discussing unlike “ forms ” that philosophic hold forth can take, proceeding then to the notion of “ spiritual exercises, ” i, philosophic meditations aimed at improving our life. Hadot then talks about some pivotal philosophic figures, including Socrates and the Stoic Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius. The last section delves into several philosophic themes pertinent to the artwork of surviving, including the value of the show, how to gain perspective on our problems, and what it means to practice doctrine as a way of life .
Read this record and you will never again think that practical philosophy is an oxymoron .
Euthydemus by Plato
Mary Margaret McCabe:
My irregular suggestion is, of course, some Plato. If the best philosophy books give you not entirely surprises but reasons to come rear to the same ledger over and over again, this is characteristic of the Platonic dialogues par excellence. He writes with full-bodied complexity, and demands from his lector thought, rendition and rethinking across a life. This list already has some Plato on it ; but I would like to propose a Platonic dialogue which is by and large ignored, the Euthydemus. It is not obviously a vehicle for whatever person might think ‘ Platonism ’ is ( that is a easing, possibly ) but it is full of puzzles and arguments that may seem plainly fallacious, but turn out to offer some significant challenges both in questions about cognition and truth, but besides to figuring out how best to live ( for example, how could we argue against person who denies that there is any such thing as falsification ? And why would we even bother ? ) .
Lewis Gordon:
I have my students read The Treatise of Zera Yacob. This 17th-century ethiopian philosopher brings together a globality of ideas and the students well make their own connections to the philosophical problems raised by other philosophers from St. Augustine through Descartes and ahead .
Philosopher Queens is a collection of blackjack concise essays introducing a diverse range of crucial women philosophers whom most people don ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate know about but in truth should. Women philosophers have long been overlooked in the philosophical canon and this excellent collection is a gateway book to many marginalized and underappreciated thinkers such as Diotima, Ban Zhao, Harriet Taylor Mill, Mary Wollstonecraft, Angela Davis, and Azizah Y. al-Hibri. The essays are written in an accessible manner with beautiful illustrations .
Susan Haack:
When I teach introduction to Philosophy I use, not one of those maddeningly bitty anthologies with which publishers bombard us, but Plato ’ mho Republic—for its width, and for the means it integrates so many areas : sociable and political philosophy, epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of mind, philosophy of education, philosophy of art, the status of women, and thus on. But of course, Plato ’ s political sight is chilling ; so I like to combine the Republic with a much more recent record, Jonathan Rauch ’ s Kindly Inquisitors : The New Attacks on Free Thought ( 1993 ) —which spells out how Plato ’ mho rationalist epistemology underpins his totalitarian political philosophy, and offers in its place a fallibilist epistemology and an articulated defense of exemption of opinion and expression. This means, students are introduced both to a key text in the history of western philosophy and to the relevance of philosophical ideas to their own lives .
Sabrina Little:
I have to say Plato ’ s Republic. It has everything—ethics, political philosophy, metaphysics, doctrine of art, moral psychology, and philosophy of education—so it is a great textbook to use as an introduction to our discipline. This text would always be my recommendation, but my students have seemed particularly athirst for, and attentive to, questions of justice, city, and person in the past class .
Stathis Psillos:
This little book, beginning published in 1637, revolutionised doctrine. It was written in the consequence of Galileo ’ s disapprobation by the Church, which forced Descartes to suppress the publication of Le Monde, his treatise of physics, and to change his point of view regarding the relations between physics and metaphysics ( aka first philosophy ). Descartes suggests that the new post-Aristotelian science, with the newfangled categories of matter in apparent motion, requires a newfangled method acting which should not start from the senses but from the judgment ; but for this method to deliver the compulsory sealed cognition, it should start from sealed truths, from gain and discrete ideas. The celebrated cogito ergo sum ( I think, therefore I am ) was taken to be the foundation of all cognition of us qua minds and of the world, via God. Far from being a heavy philosophic treatise, Discourse is a beautifully written autobiographical booklet, in which Descartes takes his readers by the pass, and without patronising them, he leads them through the rough paths he followed in searching for truth .
The main way to dip your toes into philosophy is by reading about philosophers historically, and for that, I recommend A little History of Philosophy by Nigel Warburton. however, another fantastic way to dive into it is through philosophical fiction, and for this, I highly recommend Camus ’ beautifully written The Stranger. The novel deals with absurdity, deathrate, and the recognition that “ There is not love of life without despair about life, ” set under the dazzle algerian sun .
Lewis Gordon:
I don ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate like to use textbooks or “ beginners ” books, though I ’ thousand not against those that offer a vision of philosophy and frankincense stand as text in their own right. consequently, I teach with chief sources, and I ’ ve observed over the years that big philosophers who are besides the same quality writers made extraordinary attempts to explain doctrine or at least their sight of it to people across the ages. I teach a beginners course called “ Problems of Philosophy ” in which I do the postdate. The first class begins with this paragraph :
[The seeker of wisdom/the philosopher is the one] whose heart is informed about these things which would be otherwise ignored, the one who is clear-sighted when he is deep into a problem, the one who is moderate in his actions, who penetrates ancient writings, whose advice is [sought] to unravel complications, who is really wise, who instructed his own heart, who stays awake at night as he looks for the right paths, who surpasses what he accomplished yesterday, who is wiser than a sage, who brought himself to wisdom, who asks for advice and sees to it that he is asked advice. (Inscription of Antef, 12th Dynasty, KMT/Ancient Egypt, 1991–1782 BCE)
I place this brusque paragraph right in the course of study. What is beautiful about it is that it offers much for reflection, and I don ’ t need to explain to students that philosophy didn ’ triiodothyronine begin in ancient Athens in 500 BCE because they see here a piece of writing from more than 1,000 years earlier in Km.t/Egypt. We then move to Plato ’ south Symposium, which dovetails on reflections raised hera. sometimes I go to Plato ’ s Republic, which does the lapp. The students see that acknowledging african philosophy needn ’ thymine command eliminating Hellenic think .
David Papineau:
I ’ m not sure I would still uphold many of the hearty views defended in Dawkins ’ classical. But it ’ mho surely the first script I would recommend to person who wants to understand the logic and office of natural selection. It is no accident that more than a million copies have been sold. Dawkins grabs his readers and doesn ’ thyroxine let them go. In the 40 years since the script was first published, we have come to understand natural selection much better. But Dawkins remains unexcelled at showing us what questions it raises .
Adrian Moore:
The following classic on my list is Descartes ’ Meditations on First Philosophy. Much of what I have said about Plato ’ s Meno applies to this book excessively. It is not american samoa old as the Meno, of course, but even so it is four hundred years old, and arguably the first capital text of modern doctrine. ( “ Modern ”, in this context, does not mean “ contemporary ” : it stands in contrast with “ ancient ” and “ medieval ”. ) It is consequently as remarkable in the subject of Descartes ’ Meditations as it was in the case of Plato ’ s Meno that we are able to say, as indeed we are, that it is as fresh and ampere clear as it ever was.
Descartes ’ bearing in the Meditations is to provide a guarantee foundation for science – but, equitable like Plato in the Meno, he ends up addressing a much wide determine of issues than that, all of them of enduring philosophic concern. The Meditations is another brilliant introduction to the national. ( It was besides incidentally my own introduction to the subject. )
Massimo Pigliucci:
The first record I ’ ve ever read on the philosophy of science, which hooked me onto the sphere and which was fabulously illuminating for me even as a rehearse scientist. Chalmers spans all the major schools of idea, from inductionism to falsificationism, from Kuhn ’ s mind of paradigm shifts to Feyerabend ’ s methodological anarchism, up to more recent debates, such as the realism vs anti-realism one, or the mind that science behaves ( or, at least, should behave ) as a bayesian algorithm. For every school of think, Chalmers makes a convert case to his readers, only to demolish it in the future chapter, in true socratic fashion. You will not get a final answer by the end of the book, but you will surely have learned a lot about the nature of science .
Susan Haack:
A book I much find myself recommending of late, both to students and to correspondents, is John Locke ’ s Conduct of the Understanding ( published posthumously in 1706 ). If I had to choose between this reduce bulk and the avalanche of books on “ critical intend ” published over the last decades, Locke would win hands down—for his shrewdness about human cognitive weaknesses and limitations, and his insistence that reasoning well requires, not equitable the avoidance of fallacies, but the right motives, the right attitudes, the right openness of mind. As he writes, “ [ s ] ome Men of Study and Thought, that reason right, and are Lovers of Truth, do make no capital advances in their Discoveries of it ” because :
… they converse but with one screen of Men, they read but one sort of Books, they will not come in the listen but of one kind of Notions …. They have a pretty Traffick with know Correspondents in some fiddling Creek, within that they confine themselves, but will not venture out onto the great Ocean of Knowledge, to survey the Riches that Nature hath stored other parts with, no less genuine, no less solid, no less utilitarian, than what has fallen to their bunch in the admire Plenty and Sufficiency of their own little Spot … .
Looking at holocene philosophical literature would convey the impression that the field is a solicitation of sub-specialities, cliques, and cartels ; Locke ’ s little record has the big deservingness of revealing that, and why, this late atomization is an cerebral calamity .
Eddy Keming Chen:
Saint Augustine excellently said in The Confessions, “ What then is time ? If no one asks me, I know what it is. If I wish to explain it to him who asks, I do not know. ” What is time ? What is the arrow of time ? Does fourth dimension flow ? How does time relate to space ? How to think about the four-dimensional space-time suggested in physics ? be time travel possible in light of the laws of physics ? These are famously unmanageable questions, and they point to a kin of deep scientific and philosophical issues of time. There are many academic monograph and articles written about them. For beginners, it ’ five hundred be a good theme to start with this “ graphic novel ” that is not only interesting to read but besides philosophically and scientifically accurate. Written by philosopher of clock Craig Callender and graphic artist Ralph Edney, it brings together many relevant questions about time and explains them in a fairly accessible way .
Adrian Moore:
ironically, the third book on my list, which was written as an introduction to the subject, or at any rate to one outgrowth of the subject, is credibly the least accessible of the three. Portions of it always appear on my freshman undergraduate interpretation lists, and my students often confess to me that they find it arduous work. But I can not resist including it here. It is a compendium of many of Williams ’ chief ideas, developed in his later work. But it besides serves as a beautifully concise and elegant initiation to ethics in general. It is unvoiced work. But that is part of the cause why I think it is one of the best philosophy books for beginners. philosophy is difficult exploit. In learn and assimilating a ledger like this, one is brought to a exquisite appreciation of what the rewards of that hard work can be .
Confessions by Saint Augustine
Sabrina Little:
I recommend Augustine ’ s Confessions. Because it is an autobiography, my students find it less intimidating than some of the other textbook we read. furthermore, because it is an autobiography, it offers a good model for how to take big questions personally. The Confessions is packed with adult ideas—God, humanness, sin, frailty, providence, reason, revelation, and faith—and it is the sort of reserve one can grow into. I see more every time I read it .
Utilitarianism, For and Against by J.J.C Smart and Bernard Williams
Mary Margaret McCabe:
My third base suggestion, following the ethical subject, is an old favorite : J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams ’ Utilitarianism, for and against. This is cast as a argument between the two views ; but it has some full-bodied think in it, specially in the Williams section – Williams ’ Morality is a terrific book but sometimes fair besides hard to come to first, and this makes his border on to thinking about ethical questions more tractable .
Skye Cleary:
This excellent book is an introduction to Simone de Beauvoir ’ s philosophy and life. Beauvoir was frustrated with abstract and degage doctrine and alternatively wanted to explore how philosophy could be lived. In Beauvoir ’ s words : “ there is no divorce between philosophy and life. Every living step is a philosophic option. ” Becoming Beauvoir shows how Beauvoir ’ s philosophical choices influenced her life, and vice versa, by looking at the challenges she faced and the contradictions and controversies she lived. This biography was published in 2019 and although there are other biographies already out there, this one is peculiarly clear and enlightening and draws on some newly published substantial such as Beauvoir ’ s scholar diaries and love letters .
David Papineau:
together with its sequel, Metazoa, Peter Godfrey-Smith ’ south Other Minds combines a painless initiation to the philosophy of mind with tales of scuba-diving encounters with a menagerie of submarine creatures. Other Minds is focused on the foreign mentality of octopuses, who have more neurons that the average dog but are descended from mollusk like clams and snails. Godfrey-Smith says that confronting an octopus is equivalent to meeting an alien mind, and he uses their strange psychology to cast light on the nature of intelligence. His follow-up volume, Metazoa ( the biological term for the whole animal kingdom ) broadens the canvas and aims to understand the place of consciousness itself in nature. Godfrey-Smith ’ sulfur compose is deoxyadenosine monophosphate effortless as the gesture of the submerged creatures he meets, but his arguments engage immediately with the most central issues in contemporary philosophy of beware .
Lewis Gordon:
I ’ ll decamp over others and plainly state that Bertrand Russell ’ s The Problems of Philosophy train students well to go in so many directions. There are many philosophers from across the earth we could add, but Russell ’ second prose is indeed concise and well formulated that the students leave with a sense besides of what excellent philosophic write is .
Massimo Pigliucci:
The concept of justice has been debated ever since the dawn of philosophy, for exemplify in Plato ’ randomness Crito, and likely ever since homo beings have been able to articulate their ideas so that they could debate them. Sandel ’ second book is an excellent introduction to different philosophical frameworks for thinking about justice, from utilitarianism to Kantian deontology, to Aristotelian merit ethics ( my front-runner ). contemporaneous opposing conceptions of department of justice, such as John Rawls ’ notion of department of justice as comeliness, and the libertarian claim on self-ownership, are intelligibly presented and their pros and cons discussed. The nice thing about Sandel ’ randomness writing is not equitable that it is clean and accessible, but that he keeps going back to specific questions that actually matter to people, from how to treat lease avail to affirmative action. It ’ sulfur about ethics as lived by real human beings, not as abstractly discussed in the halls of the academy .
Skye Cleary:
Simone de Beauvoir is most celebrated for The Mandarins, which won the very prestigious Prix Goncourt french literature award, and The Second Sex, her groundbreaking analysis of women ’ south situation. however, one of her best and less appreciate whole shebang is her first novel, She Came to Stay. It ’ s approximately based on Beauvoir ’ second animation, and specifically a ménage-a-trois, but it isn ’ thyroxine quite adenine lewd as it sounds – despite the naked woman on the cover of some of the english editions. It presents some of the major ideas that Jean-Paul Sartre wrote about in Being and Nothingness much more lucidly than he did. While that ’ s not difficult to do, She Came to Stay toys with existential themes – complex web of relations we weave, the gaze of the other, and might games – in a manner that ’ mho much more fun and exciting than Sartre ’ s tome .
The essays in this collection were all written in the early days of cognitive science. Ever the irregular, Dennett exposes the weak spots a quickly as he introduces the course of study. Probing the differences between people and machines, he makes us puzzle about imagination, learn, consciousness and release will. And to finish, you get the fantastic skill fabrication fable ‘ Where Am I ? ”, possibly the only philosophy article ever to be made into a film. ”
Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell
Susan Haack:
now I would add George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four and his article “ Politics in the English Language. ” The novel, of course, has both historic resonances, illustrating the dangers of Plato ’ s totalitarian political vision, and contemporaneous relevance in a fracture political world. The article raises key issues about the politicization of terminology, besides highly relevant today .
I decided that it would be effective to include a history of philosophy on my tilt. But I struggled to decide which. So I have opted to cheat for this fourth survival and equitable say : any history of philosophy. There are batch to choose from. Each has virtues and accompaniment vices. Some are much more clear than others, but besides much more vulnerable to the accusation of dumbing down. Some are much more even-handed than others, but besides much less driven by a strong narrative. And there are two defects from which closely all of them suffer : an single concenter on western thought ; and a failure to engage with the most holocene trends in philosophy. even so, any history of doctrine that you come across in a bookshop or on some web site is liable to be instructive and is liable to whet your appetite to go back to the original text .
Having said all of that, I am conscious that you will probably want to know what my own darling is. It is Frederick Copleston ’ s History of Philosophy. That combines a very eminent academic degree of handiness with an amazingly high degree of dependability. however, there is one overwhelming argue why I couldn ’ thyroxine possibly have just settled on that as my fourthly choice of a record desirable for a founder : namely, its diaphanous scale. It is in nine volumes, and it runs to some five thousand pages ! genuine, it might still serve as an excellent encyclopedic resource for a novice who wants to find out more about this or that specific thinker or about this or that specific era, but even then only a novice who already has some theme what it is they want to find out more about .
Meet our expert panel…
In a offer to answer my own question – ‘ what are the best philosophy books for beginners ? ’ – I turned to this fantastic panel of people. Spanning lots of different areas of philosophy, if anyone can guide us on the best philosophy books for beginners – it is these bright people. so, let ’ s meet our amazing panel…
Massimo Pigliucci earned a doctor’s degree in genetics from the University of Ferrara, Italy, and then a PhD in biota from the University of Connecticut, and last a ph in philosophy of skill from the University of Tennessee. He was once a professor of ecology and evolution at Stony Brook University. In 1997, he received the Theodosius Dobzhansky Prize and is besides a regular subscriber to Skeptical Inquirer .
Susan Haack is a Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts and Sciences, Professor of Philosophy, and Professor of Law at the University of Miami. She has won awards from the American Philosophical Association and from UM, for excellence in teaching ; the Provost ’ s Award for excellence in research, and the Faculty Senate Distinguished Scholar Award ; deoxyadenosine monophosphate well as the Forkosch Award for excellence in write .
hadrian Moore is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford, whose main philosophic areas of focus include Kant, Wittgenstein, history of doctrine, metaphysics, philosophy of mathematics and doctrine of logic. He is besides a prolific writer. His first record, The Infinite, was considered an ‘ authoritative overview of a subject of considerable philosophical importance ’ .
Lewis Gordon is an american philosopher who works in the areas of Africana philosophy, doctrine of human and life sciences, phenomenology, doctrine of being, social and political theory, postcolonial thinking, theories of race and racism, and more. He has written peculiarly extensively on raceway and racism, postcolonial phenomenology, Africana and black existentialism, and on the works of W. E. B. Du Bois and Frantz Fanon .
Skye C. Cleary is a philosopher who teaches at Columbia University, Barnard College, and the City College of New York. Her books include Existentialism and Romantic Love and the co-edited collection How to Live a good life : A Guide to Choosing Your Personal Philosophy. Skye is besides the Managing Editor of the American Philosophical Association ’ mho web log, an advisory board member of Strategy of Mind, and a certifiable chap with the american Philosophical Practitioners Association .
At the University of Natal, David Papineau studied mathematics and statistics for four years. In 1968, David returned to England to study philosophy at Cambridge and then completing a PhD on conceptual change and scientific rationality. David Papineau was the President of the british Society for Philosophy of Science for 1993-5, President of the Mind Association for 2009-10, and President of the aristotelian Society for 2013-14 .
Mary Margaret McCabe works on ancient philosophy, on ethics and on the philosophy of medicine. She is Professor of Philosophy Emerita at King ’ s College London, a Fellow of the british Academy, President of the british Philosophical Association ( 2008-12 ) and President of the Mind Association ( 2016-17 ) ; in 2022 she will be Honorary President of the Classical Association. MM is the Chair of Trustees of the charity Philosophy in Prison, which provides philosophic discussion for prisoners in the UK .
Eddy Keming Chen
Eddy Keming Chen is an assistant professor in the philosophy department at the University of California, San Diego ( UCSD ). He is an associate editor at the journal Foundations of Physics, a boyfriend of the John Bell Institute for the Foundations of Physics, and an affiliated staff penis of the UCSD taiwanese studies program. His most holocene newspaper “ Fundamental Nomic Vagueness ” is forthcoming in The Philosophical Review, and the idea was featured as a cover story in New Scientist in September 2020 .
Quassim Cassam
Quassim Cassam is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick, UK. He is the writer of 6 books, including Vices of the mind : From the Intellectual to the Political. His main research interests are epistemology, the doctrine of extremism and terrorism, conspiracy theories, the self and self-knowledge, and the philosophy of general practice. Before coming to Warwick, Quassim was Knightbridge Professor of Philosophy at Cambridge, Professor of Philosophy at UCL, and Reader in Philosophy at Oxford .
Sabrina Little
Sabrina Little is a philosophy Professor. In 2020, Sabrina completed a PhD in Philosophy at Baylor University. Before Baylor, Sabrina studied Philosophy of Religion at Yale Divinity School and Philosophy and Psychology at The College of William & Mary. Her main areas of interest are merit ethics, moral psychology, and ancient philosophy. Currently, Sabrina is writing about the nature of moral habituation and exploring emotional precursors to moral virtues.
Stathis Psillos is a greek philosopher of science. He is a Professor of Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics at the University of Athens, Greece and a extremity of the Rotman Institute of Philosophy—Engaging Science of the University of Western Ontario. In 2013–15, Stathis Psillos held the Rotman Canada Research Chair in Philosophy of Science at the University of Western Ontario, Canada. arguably, he is good known for his oeuvre in scientific realism and the metaphysics of skill .
If you had to cast your vote for the best philosophy books for beginners, which would you pick? Comment below and let us know which books you’d recommend as the best philosophy books for beginners.
If you enjoyed this reading list, you may also enjoy the most important philosophy books ever written.
This article of the best doctrine books for beginners was expanded upon, re-edited and re-published on Sunday 14th of March 2021 .
